![]() |
Turd of the Year | ![]() |
| 1999 Year-In-Review | ||
Biennial World Cup gains support of U.S. president Contiguglia
> NEW YORK (Thursday, January 21, 1999) -- Hoping to have the United States host
> the World Cup again as soon as possible, U.S. Soccer Federation president Bob
> Contiguglia has announced his support of a plan to have the quadrennial
> tournament held every two years.
In addition to being Turd of the Week, Dr. Bob needs to get a new eyeglass prescription to cure his obvious short-sightedness, and see an EENT (eyes, ears, nose, throat) specialist to put his nose back in joint after he dislocated it shoving it up Sepp Blatter's butt. (990122)
> Despite invitation to camp, Keller files for arbitration of USSF compliant
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C, (Friday, February 26, 1999) -- Forward Debbie Keller, not
> invited to the United States women’s residency camp in January despite
> being the team’s second leading goal-scorer last year, filed a complaint
> with the American Arbitration Association today, seeking to be restored to
> the roster.
This scary woman is one who plainly will never be satisfied. Drap her in gold
and precious jewels, dine her with rare and succulent cuisine, house her in marbled palaces, attend to her with muscular Nubian eunuchs waving palm fronds, start her in every US national team game (all ages & levels, and both genders) from now until she croaks (even when she is in a wheelchair, drooling oatmeal and pooping her Depends) and she still won't be happy!
| Boring Statistical Analysis of the Week (990319) |
Big numbers are easier to deal with, so we'll start with those, though we all know a ref would never make so many bad calls. Right? We do ... don't we?
If we assume that a 50% of Ref A's calls are bad, and Ref B is equally incompetent, then there is a 75% chance a bad call will be made:
One Crap Ref A bad (.50) = .50 (.50) +.50 A good (.50) = .50 (.50) +.00 Total 1.00 +.50 50% chance of bad call Two Crap Refs A bad (.50), B good (.50) = .25 (.50x.50) +.25 A good (.50), B bad (.50) = .25 (.50x.50) +.25 A bad (.50), B bad (.50) = .25 (.50x.50) +.25 A good (.50), B good (.50) = .25 (.50x.50) +.00 Total 1.00 +.75 75% chance of bad callLet's say we have particularly experienced and insightful refs and the possibility of making a bad call is only 10%: One Insightful Ref A bad (.40) = .10 (.10) +.10 A good (.60) = .90 (.90) +.00 Total 1.00 +.10 10% chance of blowing bad call Two Insightful Refs A bad (.10), B good (.90) = .09 (.10x.90) +.09 A good (.90), B bad (.10) = .09 (.90x.10) +.09 A bad (.10), B bad (.10) = .01 (.10x.10) +.01 A good (.90), B good (.90) = .81 (.90x.90) +.00 Total 1.00 +.19 19% chance of bad callIf Esse Baharmast had a twin: One God-Like Ref A bad (.01) = .01 (.01) +.01 A good (.99) = .99 (.99) +.00 Total 1.00 +.01 1.00% chance of bad call Two God-Like Refs A bad (.01), B good (.99) = .0099 (.01x.99) +.0099 A good (.99), B bad (.01) = .0099 (.99x.01) +.0099 A bad (.01), B bad (.01) = .0001 (.01x.01) +.0001 A good (.99), B good (.99) = .8100 (.99x.99) +.0000 Total 1.0000 +.0199 1.99% chance of bad callThus we find that the number of refs does indeed increase the likelihood of bad calls being whistled. Increasing the quality of the ref decreases the likelihood of the bad call being whistled, but not enough to compensate for the additional refs -- no matter how good the refs are. The only way two refs would not increase the likelihood of bad calls is if they are flawless; if they both never bad calls: In other words, if we let parents, players and coaches ref. However, also as shown above, increasing the quality of a single ref does decrease the likelihood of bad calls. Thus, the solution is better refs, not more refs. |
| World Cup Team Feted at White House | ||
|
| 1999 MLS Awards |
AT&T Best 11
Midfielders: Mauricio Cienfuegos (Los Angeles Galaxy), Marco Etcheverry (DC United), Steve Ralston (Tampa Bay Mutiny), Eddie Lewis (San Jose Clash), Chris Armas (Chicago Fire). Defenders: Lubos Kubik (Chicago Fire), Jeff Agoos (DC United), Robin Fraser (Los Angeles Galaxy) Goalkeeper: Kevin Hartman (Los Angeles Galaxy). Note to MLS: TotW will disregard the fact that MLS is running a formation which is suspiciously similar to the sword Steve Sampson fell on at WC '98, because at least it isn't as bizarre as Soccer America's college team of the week (2-4-4 ... no, that is not a misprint). But, MLS, if you still want to get in tune with the way the rest of the world does things, as stated last month by your Prãsident Garber, then it would behoove you to use the Roman numeral. (e.g., "AT&T Best XI"). Sucking off the bureaucrats ...
Marketing Executive of the Year: Jamey Rootes (Columbus Crew) Public Relations Executive of the Year: Adam Low (Chicago Fire) Operations Executive of the Year: Eddie Rockwell (Columbus Crew) Team Ticketing Sales Award: DC United Commissioner's Award: Alexi Lalas Last, and most definitely least ... "Custodian of the Dream" Award: Douglas Logan (I shit you not!) Jim Gregory, TotW Bribe Taker, noted that Webster's defines "custodian" as "a janitor". Jim wondered if there was a message here. Well, janitors sweep out crap, and Doug 'the Centrifuge' Logan was crap and got swept out. And nightmares are a form of dream, and the Centrifuge was a nightmare. Other than that, the only message is that it pays to be incompetent. |
| "It can be argued quite effectively that lack of experience and team unity caused our great nation’s horrible showing in France. Ditching the old guard certainly played a part in the tragedy, but did Steve Sampson do the wrong thing? If his goal was World Cup success, he most definitely screwed up. But I (having received secret signals from Steve Sampson via the receiver implanted in my teeth) think that moment, the clearing out of the dead wood and creating real competition for starting spots, will be regarded in the future as the turning point for American soccer. A lot of young players got their first caps in the run up to the World Cup and even more players have been tested since then. (Because Steve Sampson also sends signals to Bruce Arena's teeth.) The US National team may now be stronger than ever simply because Steve Sampson had the courage to say no more 'business as usual'." How could I be so blind!? *head slap* |
| TotW 1999 Archive |
![]() |